91��Ƭ��

Feet First: AI Reveals How Infants Connect with Their World

Researchers explored how infants act purposefully by attaching a colorful mobile to their foot and tracking movements with a Vicon 3D motion capture system.

---

Recent advances in computing and artificial intelligence, along with insights into infant learning, suggest that machine and deep learning techniques can help us study how infants transition from random exploratory movements to purposeful actions. Most research has focused on babies’ spontaneous movements, distinguishing between fidgety and non-fidgety behaviors.

While early movements may seem chaotic, they reveal meaningful patterns as infants interact with their environment. However, we still lack understanding of how infants intentionally engage with their surroundings and the principles guiding their goal-directed actions.

By conducting a baby-mobile experiment, used in developmental research since the late 1960s, 91��Ƭ�� researchers and collaborators investigated how infants begin to act . The baby-mobile experiment uses a colorful mobile gently tethered to an infant’s foot. When the baby kicks, the mobile moves, linking their actions to what they see. This setup helps researchers understand how infants control their movements and discover their ability to influence their surroundings.

In this new work, researchers tested whether AI tools could pick up on complex changes in patterns of infant movement. Infant movements, tracked using a Vicon 3D motion capture system, were classified into different types – from spontaneous actions to reactions when the mobile moves. By applying various AI techniques, researchers examined which methods best captured the nuances of infant behavior across different situations and how movements evolved over time.

Results of the study, published in , underscore that AI is a valuable tool for understanding early infant development and interaction. Both machine and deep learning methods accurately classified five-second clips of 3D infant movements as belonging to different stages of the experiment. Among these methods, the deep learning model, 2D-CapsNet, performed the best. Importantly, for all the methods tested, the movements of the feet had the highest accuracy rates, which means that, compared to other parts of the body, the movement patterns of the feet changed most dramatically across the stages of the experiment.

“This finding is significant because the AI systems were not told anything about the experiment or which part of the infant’s body was connected to the mobile. What this shows is that the feet – as end effectors – are the most affected by the interaction with the mobile,” said , Ph.D., co-author and Glenwood and Martha Creech Eminent Scholar in Science at the����within 91��Ƭ��’s��.��“In other words, the way infants connect with their environment has the biggest impact at the points of contact with the world. Here, this was ‘feet first.’”

The 2D-CapsNet model achieved an accuracy of 86% when analyzing foot movements and was able to capture detailed relationships between different body parts during movement. Across all methods tested, foot movements consistently showed the highest accuracy rates – about 20% higher than movements of the hands, knees, or the whole body.

“We found that infants explored more after being disconnected from the mobile than they did before they had the chance to control it. It seems that losing the ability to control the mobile made them more eager to interact with the world to find a means of reconnecting,” said Aliza Sloan, Ph.D., co-author and a postdoctoral research scientist in 91��Ƭ��’s Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences. “However, some infants showed movement patterns during this disconnected phase that contained hints of their earlier interactions with the mobile. This suggests that only certain infants understood their relationship with the mobile well enough to maintain those movement patterns, expecting that they would still produce a response from the mobile even after being disconnected.”

The researchers say that if the accuracy of infants’ movements remains high during the disconnection, it might indicate that the infants learned something during their earlier interactions. However, different types of movements might mean different things in terms of what the infants discovered.

“It’s important to note that studying infants is more challenging than studying adults because infants can’t communicate verbally,” said , Ph.D., co-author, professor in 91��Ƭ��’s��, director of the 91��Ƭ������Lab, and a member of the within the Charles E. Schmidt College of Science. “Adults can follow instructions and explain their actions, while infants cannot. That’s where AI can help. AI can help researchers analyze subtle changes in infant movements, and even their stillness, to give us insights into how they think and learn, even before they can speak. Their movements can also help us make sense of the vast degree of individual variation that occurs as infants develop.”

Looking at how AI classification accuracy changes for each infant gives researchers a new way to understand when and how they start to engage with the world.

“While past AI methods mainly focused on classifying spontaneous movements linked to clinical outcomes, combining theory-based experiments with AI will help us create better assessments of infant behavior that are relevant to their specific contexts,” said Kelso. “This can improve how we identify risks, diagnose and treat disorders.”

Study co-authors are first author Massoud Khodadadzadeh, Ph.D., formerly at Ulster University in Derry, North Ireland and now at University of Bedfordshire, United Kingdom; and Damien Coyle, Ph.D., at the University of Bath, United Kingdom.����

The research was supported by Tier 2 High Performance Computing resources provided by the Northern Ireland High-Performance Computing facility funded by the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; the U.K. Research and Innovation Turing AI Fellowship (2021-2025) funded by the Engineering and Physical Research Council, Vice Chancellor’s Research Scholarship; the Institute for Research in Applicable Computing at the University of Bedfordshire; the 91��Ƭ�� Foundation (Eminent Scholar in Science); and United States National Institutes of Health.

��

-91��Ƭ��-

Tags: research | science | technology | faculty and staff | AI